Footnotes (125)



No Time for Silence

Susan R. Klein

University of Texas School of Law

U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 48

In this essay, I respond to the position, taken by the Solicitor General of the U.S. Dept. of Justice in Chavez v. Martinez, 122 S.Ct. 2326 (2002) and by Professor Steven Clymer in 112 Yale L.J. 447 (2003), that the police are free to disgregard Miranda. I suggest that the privilege against self-incrimination is best viewed as a ban on certain official conduct outside of a criminal trial, not as an evidentiary rule. The Supreme Court in Kastigar v. United States, by blessing prosecutorial grants of immunity pursuant to statute, did not intend to extend this same authority to police officers in back rooms. I further argue that a deliberate violation of any right invoked under Miranda should give rise to a viable civil rights claim. Scholarly attacks on Miranda are simply misdirected unhappiness with the privilege itself. Finally, I suggest that the tragic events of September 11, 2001, do not warrant the abandonment of the privilege in ordinary domestic criminal cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 28, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Klein, Susan R., No Time for Silence. U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 48. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=385724 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.385724

Contact Information

Susan R. Klein (Contact Author)
University of Texas School of Law ( email )
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
512-232-1324 (Phone)
512-471-6988 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/sklein/

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,421
Downloads: 149
Download Rank: 156,524
Footnotes:  125