Running The Full-Court Press: How College Athletic Departments Unlawfully Restrict Athletes’ Rights to Speak to the News Media

56 Pages Posted: 10 Jun 2021

See all articles by Frank LoMonte

Frank LoMonte

University of Florida Levin College of Law

Virginia Hamrick

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: September 15, 2020

Abstract

The curtain of secrecy that tightly envelops college sports makes it difficult for athletes to blow the whistle on abusive conditions without fear of suffering retaliation. The seemingly obvious recourse for a player who distrusts the internal complaint process – to take the complaint public – is foreclosed at many colleges, because athletes are forbidden from speaking to the media without approval from the athletic department. Is this legal? Can a public institution enforce a categorical prohibition on speaking without running afoul of the First Amendment? Despite the widespread perception of university athletic departments, the answer almost certainly is “no.”

This article augments the growing body of scholarship about athletes’ rights by focusing on one particular and largely overlooked right: The right to speak freely to the news media. The article concludes that athletes’ right to discuss issues of public importance – including issues about the safety and integrity of the athletic program – is protected by the First Amendment at state universities, but is routinely being infringed at institutions across the country. The right to speak to the media is foundational to athletes’ ability to blow the whistle on wrongdoing and safety hazards within their own teams, which might otherwise go unaddressed.

The article analyzes the potential legal theories that a university might offer in defense of a blanket prohibition on unauthorized communication with the news media: That athletes have diminished free-speech protection because they are employees or because they are students, or that athletes voluntarily waive free-speech rights as part of the contractual bargain for receiving scholarships and other material benefits. The article finds neither theory convincing, demonstrating that neither constitutional law nor contract law provides a defensible basis for enforcing a mandatory-approval regimen before athletes may speak with journalists.The article concludes with recommendations for reforming constitutionally dubious media policies across the college athletic world.

Keywords: First Amendment, freedom of speech, media law, athlete rights

Suggested Citation

LoMonte, Frank and Hamrick, Virginia, Running The Full-Court Press: How College Athletic Departments Unlawfully Restrict Athletes’ Rights to Speak to the News Media (September 15, 2020). Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 99, No. 86, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3861817

Frank LoMonte (Contact Author)

University of Florida Levin College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.brechner.org

Virginia Hamrick

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
33
Abstract Views
204
PlumX Metrics