Rewritten Opinion: Burton v. State
FEMINIST JUDGMENTS: REWRITTEN HEALTH LAW OPINIONS (SEEMA MOHAPATRA AND LINDSAY F. WILEY, EDS.) (Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming)
Posted: 29 Jun 2021
Date Written: June 16, 2021
Abstract
Rewritten concurring opinion in Burton v. State, 49 So.3d 263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010), holding that the trial court applied the incorrect legal rule when it ordered Ms. Burton’s continued hospitalization and involuntary medical treatment, and finding that its order was not supported by competent and substantial evidence as required under Florida law.
Keywords: pregnancy, due process, constitutional law, involuntary treatment, medical decisions, feminist jurisprudence
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Sawicki, Nadia N., Rewritten Opinion: Burton v. State (June 16, 2021). FEMINIST JUDGMENTS: REWRITTEN HEALTH LAW OPINIONS (SEEMA MOHAPATRA AND LINDSAY F. WILEY, EDS.) (Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3868350
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.