The Moral Irrelevance of Constitutive Luck

Mihailis E. Diamantis, The Moral Irrelevance of Constitutive Luck, 86 Erkenntnis (forthcoming 2021)

16 Pages Posted: 8 Jul 2021

Date Written: July 3, 2021

Abstract

One’s constitution—whether one is generous or miserly, temperate or intemperate, kind or mean, etc.—is beyond one’s control in significant respects. Yet one’s constitution affects how one acts. And how one acts affects one’s moral standing. The counterintuitive inference—the so-called problem of constitutive moral luck—is that one’s moral standing is, to some significant extent, beyond one’s control. This article grants the premises but resists the inference. It argues that one’s constitution should have no net impact on one’s moral standing. While a bad constitution lowers the chance that one will act morally, it offers significant gains to moral standing should that chance materialize. A good constitution increases one’s chance of performing good acts but for correspondingly more modest gains. This effect should smooth out, and possibly eliminate, the expected impact of constitution on moral standing.

Keywords: Moral Luck, Constitutive Luck, Moral Psychology, Game Theory

Suggested Citation

Diamantis, Mihailis, The Moral Irrelevance of Constitutive Luck (July 3, 2021). Mihailis E. Diamantis, The Moral Irrelevance of Constitutive Luck, 86 Erkenntnis (forthcoming 2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3879639

Mihailis Diamantis (Contact Author)

University of Iowa - College of Law ( email )

Boyd Law Building, rm. 442
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
17
Abstract Views
78
PlumX Metrics