
Preprints with The Lancet is a collaboration between The Lancet Group of journals and SSRN to facilitate the open sharing of preprints for early engagement, community comment, and collaboration. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early-stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision-making or presented without highlighting these facts. For more information, please see the FAQs.
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by Children and Young People in Households and Schools: A Meta-Analysis of Population-Based and Contact-Tracing Studies
74 Pages Posted: 9 Jul 2021
More...Abstract
Background: The role of children and young people (CYP) in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in household and educational settings remains unclear. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of contact-tracing and population-based studies at low risk of bias.
Methods: We searched 4 electronic databases on 5 April for contact-tracing studies and population-based studies informative about transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from 0-19 year olds in household or educational settings. We excluded studies at high risk of bias, including from under-ascertainment of asymptomatic infections. We undertook multilevel random effects meta-analyses of secondary attack rates (SAR: contact-tracing studies) and school infection prevalence, and used meta-regression to examine the impact of community SARS-CoV-2 incidence, mitigations and attendance on school infection prevalence.
Findings: 4179 abstracts were reviewed, resulting in 37 included studies (17 contact-tracing; 18 population studies; 2 mixed studies). The pooled relative transmissibility of CYP compared with adults was 1.00 (0.73, 1.37) in adjusted household studies. The pooled SAR from 0CYP was significantly lower in school studies (0.5% (0.1, 1.6) than household studies (7.3% (2.5, 21.8) – p<0.0001. There was no difference in SAR from CYP to child or adult contacts. School population studies showed little evidence of clustering in classes within schools. School infection prevalence was associated with contemporary community 14-day incidence (OR 1.003 (1.001, 1.004), p<0.001) but not with school attendance rate.
Interpretation: We found no difference in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from CYP compared with adults within household settings. SAR were markedly lower in school compared with household settings, suggesting that household transmission is more important than school transmission in this pandemic. School infection prevalence was associated with community infection incidence, supporting hypotheses that school infections broadly reflect community infections. These findings are important for guiding policy decisions on shielding, vaccination school operations during the pandemic.
Funding Information: No funding obtained.
Declaration of Interests: All authors declare no competing interests.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation