Objective Chance and the Rule against Character Evidence

47 Pages Posted: 9 Jul 2021 Last revised: 23 Aug 2021

See all articles by Hillel J. Bavli

Hillel J. Bavli

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law

Date Written: July 19, 2020

Abstract

A central principle of U.S. law is that individuals should be judged in court based on their actions and not on their character. Rule 404 of the Federal Rules of Evidence therefore prohibits evidence of an individual’s previous acts to prove that the individual acted in accordance with a certain character or propensity. But courts regularly deviate from or altogether ignore this rule, resulting in arbitrary judgments based on an individual’s prior acts rather than on evidence regarding the events at issue in a case. This raises serious constitutional and fairness concerns, deepens racial and economic inequality in the criminal justice system, and creates a range of socially harmful incentives.

I address this problem from a new angle—a scientific one. I argue that a type of evidence that I refer to as “objective-chance evidence” is at the center of the unpredictability surrounding the rule against character evidence. I apply a simple statistical model to resolve longstanding confusion regarding the nature of objective-chance evidence, and to demonstrate the need for a new approach to objective-chance evidence in the courts. I argue that central to a more logical and effective rule against character evidence is 1) a proper understanding of objective-chance evidence as a particular category of character evidence, and 2) an “objective-chance exception” that replaces the rule against character evidence with a 403-type balancing for objective-chance evidence. In turn, these steps permit a proper interpretation of Rule 404 and a stricter adherence to the rule against character evidence. Finally, I examine the feasibility of an objective-chance exception, and I demonstrate broad and significant implications for minimizing error in case outcomes and reducing inequality based on race and economic disadvantage in the criminal justice system.

An earlier version of this article can be found at the following address: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3664837.

Keywords: character evidence, Rule 404, Federal Rules of Evidence, FRE, doctrine of objective chances, doctrine of chances, prior-acts evidence, other-acts evidence, propensity evidence, judgment variability, unpredictability, accuracy, bias-variance tradeoff, shrinkage estimation, hierarchical models

Suggested Citation

Bavli, Hillel, Objective Chance and the Rule against Character Evidence (July 19, 2020). SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 513, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3883579 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3883579

Hillel Bavli (Contact Author)

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
266
rank
461,978
PlumX Metrics