Sophisticated Banking Contracts and Fragility When Withdrawal Information is Public

49 Pages Posted: 13 Jul 2021 Last revised: 7 Oct 2022

See all articles by Xuesong Huang

Xuesong Huang

Lingnan College, Sun Yat-sen University

Date Written: July 11, 2021

Abstract

I study whether self-fulfilling bank runs can occur when banks use sophisticated contracts and withdrawal decisions are public information. In a finite-agent version of Diamond and Dybvig (1983) with correlated types, I first present an example in which a bank run perfect Bayesian equilibrium exists. However, its existence relies on off-path beliefs that are unreasonable in terms of forward induction. To disciple these beliefs, I use forward induction equilibrium (Cho, 1987) as the solution concept. I show that, whenever the allocation rule is strictly incentive compatible, the truth-telling strategy is the unique forward induction equilibrium in the withdrawal game and no bank run occurs. Therefore, with forward induction, sophisticated banking contracts can eliminate banking fragility when there is public information about withdrawal decisions.

Keywords: Bank runs; Sophisticated contracts; Public information; Forward induction; Correlated types.

JEL Classification: D82, D83, G21

Suggested Citation

Huang, Xuesong, Sophisticated Banking Contracts and Fragility When Withdrawal Information is Public (July 11, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3884384 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3884384

Xuesong Huang (Contact Author)

Lingnan College, Sun Yat-sen University ( email )

GuangZhou, GuangDong
China

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
106
Abstract Views
393
rank
366,326
PlumX Metrics