When and Why Do Supervisors’ Evaluations Overweight Subordinates’ Performance Outcomes? Evidence From a Team Setting in the Field

49 Pages Posted: 28 Jul 2021 Last revised: 22 Apr 2024

Date Written: March 28, 2024

Abstract

To better understand supervisors’ outcome bias, I use a regression discontinuity design that compares coaches’ performance assessments of professional football players involved in narrow wins and losses. In my setting, I document that supervisors overreact to negative outcomes, sharply lowering performance ratings and tripling subordinate turnover. I find that supervisors’ evaluations that subjectively incorporate information from more incomplete objective performance measures are more prone to outcome bias than those that do so using less incomplete objective measures. I also document that supervisors’ evaluations of high-performing team members are more prone to outcome bias than supervisors’ evaluations of low-performers. Finally, I find that outcomes affect supervisors’ ex post information collection. My findings, consistent with predictions that I derive from the theory of cognitive reconstruction, shed light on supervisors’ outcome bias in team settings and how effectively firms’ use of objective performance measures, direct monitoring, and information gathering can mitigate this bias.

Keywords: subjective performance evaluation, outcome bias, cognitive reconstruction, information gathering

JEL Classification: M50, D91, Z20

Suggested Citation

Ferguson, Patrick J., When and Why Do Supervisors’ Evaluations Overweight Subordinates’ Performance Outcomes? Evidence From a Team Setting in the Field (March 28, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3894211 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3894211

Patrick J. Ferguson (Contact Author)

The University of Melbourne ( email )

Parkville, 3010
Australia

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
271
Abstract Views
1,318
Rank
217,123
PlumX Metrics