'Not' Madison

CPI Antitrust Chron, Jul. 2021

10 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2021

See all articles by Jorge L. Contreras

Jorge L. Contreras

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Date Written: July 27, 2021


This essay challenges the claim that President James Madison, the namesake of the Trump Administration’s “New Madison” Approach to Antitrust and Intellectual Property Law, was an advocate for strong patent rights unconstrained by the limitations of antitrust law. While Madison supported the authority of Congress to grant patents to inventors, this view was widely shared by his contemporaries. Rather than advocating for strong patent rights, Madison’s writings reveal that he was concerned about the “exorbitant gains” that patents and other monopolies could confer upon their holders, while at the same time preventing individuals from exercising their trades. Most importantly, Madison formulated his views a full century before the enactment of the antitrust laws, in an economic environment in which private firms could not acquire market power absent governmentally-issued monopolies. This suggests that Madison is an inapt namesake for the policies of a federal agency that is charged with enforcing the antitrust laws today. For all of these reasons, the “New Madison” approach is plainly “Not” Madison, and the continued misuse of this label distorts the views of a major figure in American Constitutional history.

Keywords: patent, standards, FRAND, Madison, Jefferson, Constitution, maximalism

Suggested Citation

Contreras, Jorge L., 'Not' Madison (July 27, 2021). CPI Antitrust Chron, Jul. 2021, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3895810 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3895810

Jorge L. Contreras (Contact Author)

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )

383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics