Readability Affects Scientific Impact: Evidence from Emerging Technology Discourses

BRL Working Paper Series No. 21 (2021)

21 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2021

Date Written: August 2, 2021

Abstract

This study examines how the readability of scientific discourses changes over time and to what extent readability can explain scientific impact in terms of citation counts. The basis is a representative dataset of 135,502 abstracts from academic research papers pertaining to twelve technologies of different maturity. Using three different measures of readability, it is found that the language of the abstracts has become more complex over time. Across all technologies, less easily readable texts are more likely to receive at least one citation, while the effects are most pronounced for comparatively immature research streams. Among the more mature or larger discourses, the abstracts of the top 10% and 1% of the most often cited articles are significantly less readable. It remains open to what extent readability actually influences future citations and how much of the relationship is causal. If readability indeed drives citations, the results imply that scientists have an incentive to (artificially) reduce the readability of their abstracts in order to signal quality and competence to readers—both to get noticed at all and to attract more citations. This may mean a prisoner dilemma in academic (abstract) writing, where authors intentionally but unnecessarily complicate the way in which they communicate their work.

Keywords: Readability, Citations, Scientific impact, Emerging technologies

Suggested Citation

Ante, Lennart, Readability Affects Scientific Impact: Evidence from Emerging Technology Discourses (August 2, 2021). BRL Working Paper Series No. 21 (2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3897998 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3897998

Lennart Ante (Contact Author)

Blockchain Research Lab ( email )

Colonnaden 72
Hamburg, 22303
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
6
Abstract Views
47
PlumX Metrics