Textualism, Dynamism, and the Meaning of "Sex"

2022 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 41.

17 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2021 Last revised: 15 Feb 2022

See all articles by Bill Watson

Bill Watson

University of Illinois College of Law

Date Written: February 14, 2022

Abstract

A recent Article by Professors William N. Eskridge, Brian G. Slocum, and Stefan Th. Gries critically examines textualism, both in general and as applied in Bostock v. Clayton County. This Essay makes three points in reply. First, the authors criticize strawman versions of textualism that no mainstream legal interpreter claims to hold. Second, the authors’ examples of “societal dynamism” do not put any pressure on textualism properly understood. And third, the authors’ corpus-linguistics analysis of the word “sex” is, from a textualist perspective, irrelevant to the issue in Bostock.

Keywords: textualism, dynamism, statutory interpretation, pragmatic enrichment, Bostock v. Clayton County

Suggested Citation

Watson, Bill, Textualism, Dynamism, and the Meaning of "Sex" (February 14, 2022). 2022 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 41., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3904810 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3904810

Bill Watson (Contact Author)

University of Illinois College of Law ( email )

504 E Pennsylvania Ave
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
141
Abstract Views
672
Rank
422,321
PlumX Metrics