Can Restorative Justice Conferencing Reduce Recidivism? Evidence from the Make-it-Right Program

61 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2021 Last revised: 24 Feb 2023

See all articles by Yotam Shem-Tov

Yotam Shem-Tov

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Steven Raphael

University of California, Berkeley

Alissa Skog

University of California, Berkeley

Date Written: August 2021

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of a restorative justice intervention targeted at youth ages 13 to 17 facing felony charges of medium severity (e.g., burglary, assault). Eligible youths were randomly assigned to participate in the Make-it-Right (MIR) restorative justice program or a control group where they faced standard criminal prosecution. We estimate the effects of MIR on the likelihood that a youth will be rearrested in the four years following randomization. Assignment to MIR reduces the probability of a rearrest within six months by 19 percentage points, a 44 percent reduction relative to the control group. Moreover, the reduction in recidivism persists even four years after randomization. Thus, our estimates show that restorative justice conferencing can reduce recidivism among youth charged with relatively serious offenses and can be an effective alternative to traditional criminal justice practices.

Suggested Citation

Shem-Tov, Yotam and Raphael, Steven and Skog, Alissa, Can Restorative Justice Conferencing Reduce Recidivism? Evidence from the Make-it-Right Program (August 2021). NBER Working Paper No. w29150, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3905714

Yotam Shem-Tov (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )

405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951361
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States

Steven Raphael

University of California, Berkeley

310 Barrows Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

Alissa Skog

University of California, Berkeley

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
264
PlumX Metrics