When the Means Undermine the End: the Leviathan of Securities Law and Enforcement in Digital-Asset Markets

The Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy (peer-reviewed, Forthcoming 2022)

60 Pages Posted: 11 Sep 2021 Last revised: 21 Dec 2021

See all articles by Yuliya Guseva

Yuliya Guseva

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: December 20, 2021

Abstract

Machiavelli famously said that actions of all men, particularly of regulators, should be judged by the results. Paraphrasing Machiavelli, the end justifies the means. This Article addresses a situation where the means undermine the regulatory ends.
The focus of this Article is the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the major capital-market watchdog. Created in the wake of the Great Depression, the SEC pursues a ternary set of objectives, including protecting investors, maintaining efficient markets, and facilitating capital formation. This Article examines a fundamental disconnect between the objectives of the SEC and the actual outcome of its policies in digital-asset markets—the agency’s enforcement efforts under the mantra of protecting investors and providing digital-asset markets with more information have produced an environment with less information. This disconnect between the SEC’s means and ends is relevant not only to cryptoasset investors but also to other purchasers such as consumers and users.
Using two hand-collected datasets, the Article shows that following an increase in enforcement, cryptoasset issuers have attempted to comply with securities law by resorting to private placements. This compliance option reduces market transparency and is harmful to the less sophisticated crypto-investors. In contrast, the more sophisticated crypto-investors rely on what the Article calls “the pure-information model” that exists independently of the SEC-enforced regulations.
To conclude, in actively enforcing pre-digital-asset law, the SEC has funneled crypto-issuers into inadequate and lackadaisical compliance with exemptions and created a status quo that is antithetical to the SEC’s core mission of protecting investors. This status quo is also harmful to crypto-issuers, who face higher capital costs. As no one wins in this scenario, a reform revising crypto-issuer disclosure is needed.

Keywords: Capital markets, financial innovation, cryptoassets, digital-asset markets, regulation, Securities and Exchange Commission, securities, cryptocurrencies, empirical

JEL Classification: K00, K2, K22, K42, K20

Suggested Citation

Guseva, Yuliya, When the Means Undermine the End: the Leviathan of Securities Law and Enforcement in Digital-Asset Markets (December 20, 2021). The Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy (peer-reviewed, Forthcoming 2022) , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3917009 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3917009

Yuliya Guseva (Contact Author)

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School ( email )

Newark, NJ
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
273
Abstract Views
988
rank
90,481
PlumX Metrics