Medicare for All vs. Medicare As Is: Eight Key Differences

Journal of Aging Law & Policy, pp. 115-140 (2021)

University of Illinois College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 21-23

26 Pages Posted: 17 Sep 2021 Last revised: 29 Sep 2021

See all articles by Richard L. Kaplan

Richard L. Kaplan

University of Illinois College of Law

Date Written: September 17, 2021

Abstract

This article examines eight principal differences between the Medicare-for-All proposal championed by Senator Sanders, inter alia, and the Medicare program as it actually exists. In doing so, the article shows how the current program bears little resemblance to what the Medicare-for-All proponents are trying to enact. Those key differences include: (1) Medicare is a real program, (2) Medicare is only health care financing, (3) Medicare is an earned entitlement, (4) Medicare is not a simple program, (5) Medicare has a significant co-insurance component, (6) Medicare’s financing relies on non-Medicare enrollees, (7) Medicare’s coverage of long-term care is minimal, and (8) Medicare can accommodate expansion without major disruption. The article concludes that the differences between Medicare as it is and Medicare-for-All are too significant to elide and may make the effort to enact Medicare-for All less likely to succeed.

Suggested Citation

Kaplan, Richard L., Medicare for All vs. Medicare As Is: Eight Key Differences (September 17, 2021). Journal of Aging Law & Policy, pp. 115-140 (2021), University of Illinois College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 21-23, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3925600

Richard L. Kaplan (Contact Author)

University of Illinois College of Law ( email )

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
(217) 333-2499 (Phone)
(217) 244-1478 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
152
Abstract Views
452
Rank
357,380
PlumX Metrics