Licensing Negotiation Groups for SEPs - Collusive Technology Buyers Arrangements: Pitfalls and Reasonable Alternatives

les Nouvelles (December 2021)

8 Pages Posted: 21 Sep 2021 Last revised: 18 Jan 2022

See all articles by Igor Nikolic

Igor Nikolic

European University Institute

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: September 19, 2021

Abstract

One of the experts within the European Commission’s Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) Expert Group proposed the formation of licensing negotiations groups (LNGs) by implementers to collectively negotiate with SEP owners and patent pools. Accordingly, LNGs could be used for a more efficient SEP licensing, particularly relevant in the Internet of Things with increasingly new stakeholders entering the market. This article examines how LNGs could work in practice and raises concerns about LNGs turning into hidden buyers’ cartels creating an industry wide collective holdout. As a less restrictive alternative, this article explains how existing patent pools and other similar licensing platforms that aggregate complementary SEPs and provide one-stop shop for licensing already enable the efficiency and transaction costs savings in the IoT with no harmful anti-competitive effects. By gathering inputs from individual implementers before the formation of royalty programs, some licensing platforms can ensure that implementers are consulted and participate in royalty formulations without the risk of collusive outcomes.

Keywords: standard essential patents, FRAND, licensing negotiations groups, collusion, competition law

Suggested Citation

Nikolic, Igor, Licensing Negotiation Groups for SEPs - Collusive Technology Buyers Arrangements: Pitfalls and Reasonable Alternatives (September 19, 2021). les Nouvelles (December 2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3926650

Igor Nikolic (Contact Author)

European University Institute ( email )

Villa Schifanoia
133 via Bocaccio
Firenze (Florence), Tuscany 50014
Italy

Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?

Paper statistics

Downloads
170
Abstract Views
423
rank
198,023
PlumX Metrics