Defense Counsel's Cross Purposes: Prior Conviction Impeachment of Prosecution Witnesses

29 Pages Posted: 24 Sep 2021 Last revised: 9 Jun 2022

Date Written: September 20, 2021

Abstract

A broad scholarly coalition supports the prohibition or diminution of the impeachment of criminal defendants with their convictions. Yet scholars should pay more attention to the flipside arrangement: impeachment of prosecution witnesses by defense counsel. First, because those engaged in reform efforts need to resolve the competing interests: constitutional arguments on behalf of the defense, but, on the other hand, concerns about a tool that (regardless of the nature of the witness) risks reinforcing biases and stereotypes. Second, because the impossibility of adequate resolution is itself important to note. Whether one considers the conflicting values of rule-makers deciding whether to regulate this, or the conflicting values of defense attorneys deciding whether to deploy it, the intractability underscores the appeal of abolitionist visions.

Keywords: impeachment, 609, abolition, prior conviction impeachment, FRE 609

JEL Classification: K14, K41

Suggested Citation

Roberts, Anna, Defense Counsel's Cross Purposes: Prior Conviction Impeachment of Prosecution Witnesses (September 20, 2021). Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 4, 2022 (symposium issue), 87 Brook. L. Rev. 1225 (2022), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3927381 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3927381

Anna Roberts (Contact Author)

Brooklyn Law School ( email )

250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
84
Abstract Views
404
Rank
448,476
PlumX Metrics