Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication. Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Traumatic Effect of Beirut Port Explosion on Lebanese People's Experiences
35 Pages Posted: 23 Sep 2021More...
Background: Mental distress and decreased functionality are highly prevalent after collective traumas. Investigating the needs and vulnerabilities are necessary to subsequently guide short and long term targeted interventions. We aim to identify a clustered-dimensional approach to people’s experiences after the apocalyptic Beirut Port explosion, with potentially higher behavioral intention indication than traditional categorical psychopathological assessments.
Methods: This cross-sectional internet based study was conducted on November 2020, 4 months after August 4th trauma. It included 1323 Lebanese adult residents and expatriates. Emotions and attitudes following the blast were assessed using iCode software, measuring explicit answers and implicit reaction-time to 61 presented statements. Factor and cluster analysis subsequently differentiated respondents.
Outcomes: General explicit responses reveal alarming levels of distress and generalized fears (75-80%). Implicit measurements suggest high confidence in describing negative emotions (only 20-30% distortion) but low confidence in anticipating additional adversities (50-60 %). Multi-factorial cluster analysis indicates significant differences on 9 tested dimensions for 3 distinctive groups. High emotional distress and intrusive thoughts were most intense in the group with highest job worries and media reliance. Those with highest faith and community resilience had lowest negative emotions and avoidance. The third cluster was mostly marked by country dissatisfaction.
Interpretation: These findings suggest that integrating implicit responses helps profile people’s experiences after a collective trauma, and provides insight onto their hard-wired attitudes and beliefs beyond demographics factors taken alone and classical psychopathology. The study provides suggestions for targeted outreach mental and human assistance.
Declaration of Interest: Dr Rafal Ohme is the founder and chairman of NEUROHM. Authors report no other conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval: This study was approved with ethical approval of the institutional review board IRB at the Lebanese American University (LAU) [tracking number LAU.SAS.MM12.16/Oct/2020].
Keywords: Collective trauma, Beirut Port Explosion, mental distress, spirituality, PTSD.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation