Jurisdictional Problems, Comity Solutions

61 Pages Posted: 11 Oct 2021 Last revised: 2 May 2022

See all articles by Daniel B. Listwa

Daniel B. Listwa

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz

Lea Brilmayer

Yale University - Law School

Date Written: September 26, 2021

Abstract

American choice of law is today portrayed as a story of how a more modern and functionalist methodology came to overthrow the long dominant territorial system. Against this background, the situs rule—the territorial rule requiring that all property-related issues be governed by the law of the jurisdiction in which the property is located—is seen as an unusual straggler of a now-debunked theory. Central to this narrative is the idea that the vested rights theory, which was embraced by the Restatement (First) of Conflict of Laws and assumed away the possibility for overlapping jurisdictions, represented “traditional” choice of law, going back to Justice Joseph Story, the father of American conflicts law. This is the perspective adopted by the now-in-the-works Restatement (Third), which aims to usher in a new era for American conflict of laws by cutting out all vestiges of the “traditional” model—the situs rule included.

But this narrative, while broadly held, is wrong. It is a mistake to associate choice of law during the early Republic with an early twentieth-century model of territorialism. In this Essay, we explain that the early American choice-of-law model, as described by Justice Story, was not territorial, but rather intensely functional, with its prime focus being resolving the uncertainty created by the constitutional law governing the limits of personal jurisdiction and the recognition of sister-state judgments. In this context, the persistence of the situs rule appears to be not an anachronism but rather an indication that “modern” choice-of-law theories misunderstand the forces shaping conflict-of-laws doctrine today. Using the situs rule as a window into the foundations of choice of law, this Essay thus calls into question the standard narrative underlying contemporary choice-of-law literature and challenges the approach of the proposed Restatement (Third).

Keywords: choice of law, property, situs rule, legal history, conflict of laws

Suggested Citation

Listwa, Daniel and Brilmayer, Lea, Jurisdictional Problems, Comity Solutions (September 26, 2021). Texas Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3930954

Daniel Listwa (Contact Author)

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz ( email )

51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
United States

Lea Brilmayer

Yale University - Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
200
Abstract Views
539
rank
208,925
PlumX Metrics