The Aftermath of Carpenter: An Empirical Study of Fourth Amendment Law, 2018-2021

63 Pages Posted: 28 Sep 2021 Last revised: 10 May 2022

See all articles by Matthew Tokson

Matthew Tokson

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Date Written: September 28, 2021

Abstract

Fourth Amendment law is in flux. The Supreme Court recently established, in the landmark case Carpenter v. United States, that individuals can retain Fourth Amendment rights in information they disclose to a third party. In the internet era, this ruling has the potential to extend privacy protections to a huge variety of sensitive digital information. But Carpenter is also notoriously vague. Scholars and lower courts have tried to guess at what the law of Fourth Amendment searches will be going forward—and have reached different, contradictory conclusions.

This Article reports the results of a large-scale empirical study of the impact of a transformative Supreme Court decision in federal and state courts. It analyzes all 857 federal and state judgments applying Carpenter from its publication in June 2018 through March 2021. Relying on this unique, hand-coded database, the Article illuminates both the present and future of Fourth Amendment law.

In doing so, it identifies the factors that drive modern Fourth Amendment search decisions—and those that fail to drive them. It examines disagreements among lower courts about the scope and breadth of Carpenter, as some courts apply its concepts expansively while others attempt to narrow it from below. It assesses how state courts apply federal constitutional law, blending federal and state interests in unique ways. And it analyzes the enormous practical impact of the “good faith exception” to the exclusionary rule, which permits the government to use unconstitutionally obtained evidence to convict defendants if such evidence was collected in reliance on prior law. Based on these findings, the Article explores alternative directions that courts may take as they continue to refine Fourth Amendment law and address novel surveillance technologies. In addition to its many contributions to the Fourth Amendment literature, the Article is the most comprehensive empirical study to date of the jurisprudential impact of a Supreme Court case in the years following its publication.

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, Carpenter, Supreme Court, Federalism, Parity, Good Faith Exception, Empirical Legal Studies

Suggested Citation

Tokson, Matthew J., The Aftermath of Carpenter: An Empirical Study of Fourth Amendment Law, 2018-2021 (September 28, 2021). Harvard Law Review, Forthcoming, University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 470, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3932015

Matthew J. Tokson (Contact Author)

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )

383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://faculty.utah.edu/u6012359-Matthew_Tokson/biography/index.hml

Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,047
Abstract Views
3,726
rank
29,371
PlumX Metrics