Public Response to Government Use of AI-technology in Emergencies: Evidence from Covid-19

41 Pages Posted: 29 Sep 2021 Last revised: 23 Jan 2023

Date Written: September 28, 2021

Abstract

In the effort to contain the COVID-19 outbreak and mitigate its consequences, many hopes were placed on the use of AI technology. Indeed, AI-based algorithms have informed decision-making in many aspects of the crisis, including diagnosis, infection tracking, outbreak forecasting, and allocation of essential resources and services. How do citizens view the incorporation of AI technology in making major public policy decisions? Using original survey data from the U.S. and Israel, I show that citizens trust humans significantly more than algorithms in making high-stake decisions related to the pandemic. However, experimental evidence indicates that this clear preference does not translate uniformly into lower support for policies that rely on algorithmic assessment. Rather, views on the use of algorithms differ substantially depending on the decision context in which it is deployed. The analysis indicates that while the deployment of AI in public policy may be acceptable in some cases, it could trigger substantial opposition in other theoretically-predictable contexts.

Keywords: algorithmic decision-making, public policy, COVID-19, public attitudes, algorithmic fairness

Suggested Citation

Raviv, Shir, Public Response to Government Use of AI-technology in Emergencies: Evidence from Covid-19 (September 28, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3932328 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3932328

Shir Raviv (Contact Author)

Columbia University ( email )

Northwest Corner, 550 W 120th St
New York City, NY 10027
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
139
Abstract Views
949
Rank
441,357
PlumX Metrics