Deficit Frame Dangers

30 Pages Posted: 5 Oct 2021

Date Written: October 3, 2021

Abstract

Civil rights advocates have long viewed litigation as an essential, if insufficient, catalyst of social change. In part, it is. But in critical respects that remain underexplored in legal scholarship, civil rights litigation can hinder short- and long-term projects of racial justice.

Specifically, certain civil rights doctrines reward plaintiffs for emphasizing community deficits—or what I term a “deficit frame.” Legal doctrine, in other words, invites legal narratives that track, activate, and reinforce pernicious racial stereotypes. This dynamic, even in the context of well-intended litigation, risks entrenching conditions that drive racial inequality—including the conditions that litigation is often intended to address. To concretize the theory, this Article explores how deficit frames can influence the behavior of four key constituencies who impact—and often undermine—the pursuit of educational equality.

Keywords: race, social science, civil rights, education law, antidiscrimination law

Suggested Citation

Feingold, Jonathan, Deficit Frame Dangers (October 3, 2021). Georgia State University Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2021, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3935236

Jonathan Feingold (Contact Author)

Boston University School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
16
Abstract Views
70
PlumX Metrics