Using Folded Seats-Votes Curves to Compare Partisan Bias in the 2020 Presidential Election with Partisan Bias in the Five Other Presidential Elections in the 21st Century

Presidential Studies Quarterly

18 Pages Posted: 2 Dec 2021 Last revised: 24 Mar 2022

See all articles by Jonathan Cervas

Jonathan Cervas

Carnegie Mellon University

Bernard Grofman

University of California, Irvine

Date Written: March 21, 2022

Abstract

Using a folded seats-votes curve, we examine partisan bias in the 2020 presidential election and compare it to partisan bias in the five other presidential elections in the 21st century. 2020 and 2016 are extreme outliers with respect to the absolute magnitude of partisan bias in the Electoral College. In 2016, 2020, and 2000 bias runs in a pro-Republican direction; in the other three elections in this century, the opposite is true. But partisan bias can vary with where on the seats-vote curve we look to find bias, and we identify the lowest vote share at which there is no partisan bias (if such exists).

Suggested Citation

Cervas, Jonathan and Grofman, Bernard, Using Folded Seats-Votes Curves to Compare Partisan Bias in the 2020 Presidential Election with Partisan Bias in the Five Other Presidential Elections in the 21st Century (March 21, 2022). Presidential Studies Quarterly , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3937648 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3937648

Jonathan Cervas (Contact Author)

Carnegie Mellon University ( email )

Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
United States

HOME PAGE: http://jonathan Cervas.com

Bernard Grofman

University of California, Irvine ( email )

School of Social Sciences
SSPB 2291
Irvine, CA 92697
United States
19497331094 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.socsci.uci.edu/~bgrofman/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
51
Abstract Views
624
Rank
803,268
PlumX Metrics