SOMETHING ROTS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND IT’S THE SEARCH WARRANT: THE BREONNA TAYLOR CASE

102 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW __ (2022).

58 Pages Posted:

See all articles by Blanche Cook

Blanche Cook

University of Kentucky College of Law

Date Written: October 12, 2021

Abstract

When police rammed the door of Breonna Taylor’s home and shot her six times in a hail of thirty-two bullets, they lacked legal justification for being there. The affidavit supporting the warrant was perjurious, stale, vague, and lacking in particularity. The killing of Breonna Taylor, however, is not just a story about the illegality of the warrant, it is also about the legality of the circumstances that facilitated her killing. Police officers lying to obtain warrants and magistrates rubber stamping facially defective warrants are the stories of individual failings. This article examines a weightier structural issue: how the Supreme Court fashioned legal doctrine that created the conditions that led to Breonna Taylor’s death.

This article transcends the narrative of bad-apple cops. It is the first to present a structural framework for analyzing how Court rulings about the acquisition and execution of search warrants inequitably distribute premature death in marginalized communities. When the Court refused to apply the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained in violation of the knock-and-announce requirement, it incentivized police to ignore the rule. The result has been callousness in the execution of warrants and carelessness in their acquisition. When the Court gave police immunity for violating the rule, it sealed Breonna Taylor’s fate. Police refusal to knock and announce and to engage in a substantial waiting period before ramming the door is untenable in an age of increased Stand Your Ground Laws and unbridled gun ownership. The proper protocols for police home invasion demand SCOTUS review.

The spectacle of Taylor’s killing, along with so many others, inflicted a cultural trauma on the public, particularly marginalized communities. The illegal warrant that set Taylor’s death in motion, therefore, demands a public vetting, preferably in an adversarial setting where one party does not monopolize both the facts and the narratives surrounding those facts. The repeated failure to hold police accountable for their killings will destroy the criminal justice system as we know it. The next Breonna Taylor is both foreseeable and preventable if that is what we elect to do.

Keywords: Breonna Taylor, police, police violence, police killing, search warrant, probable cause, Hudson v. Michigan

Suggested Citation

Cook, Blanche, SOMETHING ROTS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND IT’S THE SEARCH WARRANT: THE BREONNA TAYLOR CASE (October 12, 2021). 102 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW __ (2022)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=

Blanche Cook (Contact Author)

University of Kentucky College of Law ( email )

620 S. Limestone Street
Lexington, KY 40506-0048
United States
8592578352 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
50
Abstract Views
126
PlumX Metrics