Errors in Shareholder Voting

84 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2021 Last revised: 12 Aug 2023

See all articles by Patrick Blonien

Patrick Blonien

Rice University - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business

Alan D. Crane

Rice University - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business

Kevin Crotty

Rice University - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business

David De Angelis

University of Houston - C.T. Bauer College of Business

Date Written: August 10, 2023

Abstract

We develop a structural empirical framework to study voting outcomes and the role of proxy advisors for shareholder proposals. Voting errors occur when bad proposals pass (false positives) and good proposals fail (false negatives). 6.5% of voting outcomes for shareholder proposals are mistakes, the majority being false positives. Recommendations by proxy advisor ISS are incorrect roughly half the time. ISS makes more mistakes when they support proposals (70%), but investors rely less on those recommendations than when ISS is not in favor. Errors in voting outcomes are more sensitive to proxy advisor informativeness and influence than to proposal quality.

Keywords: shareholder voting, shareholder proposals, proxy advice, informed voting

JEL Classification: G30

Suggested Citation

Blonien, Patrick and Crane, Alan D. and Crotty, Kevin and De Angelis, David, Errors in Shareholder Voting (August 10, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3945818 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3945818

Patrick Blonien

Rice University - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business ( email )

Houston, TX
United States

Alan D. Crane (Contact Author)

Rice University - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business ( email )

6100 South Main Street
P.O. Box 1892
Houston, TX 77005-1892
United States

Kevin Crotty

Rice University - Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business ( email )

6100 Main Street
Houston, TX 77005-1892
United States

David De Angelis

University of Houston - C.T. Bauer College of Business ( email )

Houston, TX 77204-6021
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
322
Abstract Views
1,176
Rank
163,443
PlumX Metrics