SPAC Mergers, IPOs, and the PSLRA's Safe Harbor: Unpacking Claims of Regulatory Arbitrage

56 Pages Posted: 14 Dec 2021

See all articles by Amanda M. Rose

Amanda M. Rose

Vanderbilt University - Law School

Date Written: October 19, 2021

Abstract

Many are contending that communications in connection with SPAC mergers should be excluded from the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA). This is necessary, it is argued, to close a regulatory loophole and place SPAC mergers and IPOs on a “level playing field” with respect to management projections, as the safe harbor excludes communications in connection with IPOs. Would excluding communications in connection with SPAC mergers from the PSLRA’s safe harbor be good public policy? Is the IPO exclusion itself good public policy? This Article analyzes these surprisingly complex questions.

Keywords: Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, SPACs, initial public offerings, IPOs, forecasts, projections, liability, private securities litigation reform act, PSLRA, safe harbor, reasonable investor, materiality, gameification, retail investors, Robinhood, commercial speech, securities regulation

Suggested Citation

Rose, Amanda M., SPAC Mergers, IPOs, and the PSLRA's Safe Harbor: Unpacking Claims of Regulatory Arbitrage (October 19, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3945975 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3945975

Amanda M. Rose (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )

131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
161
Abstract Views
417
rank
238,160
PlumX Metrics