Audit quality and earnings management after communicating Key Audit Matters (KAMs) in the UAE – audacity and auditors’ perspectives

Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 20(2), pp. 173-198

26 Pages Posted: 18 Nov 2021

See all articles by Yasser Barghathi

Yasser Barghathi

Zayed University - College of Business

Simran Mirani

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Naimat Ullah Khan

Cardiff School of Management, Cardiff Metropolitan University UK

Date Written: June 30, 2021

Abstract

Abstract
Research Question: Does the introduction of Key Audit Matters (KAMs) increase audit quality and reduce agency cost associated with it? Does the introduction of KAMs decrease Earnings Management (EM) and agency cost associated with it?
Motivation: There have been many studies in the past few years testing the impact of KAMs on the quality of the audit and EM in the developed economies like the United States and United Kingdom, however very few studies exist in the context of the UAE. Moreover, many studies on this topic uses quantitative techniques whereas this study employs qualitative method of interview to judge the perception of auditors about the audit quality and EM in the UAE after the introduction of KAMs.
Idea: The research seeks the perception of auditors about the quality of audit and EM after the introduction of communicating KAMs in the UAE.
Data and Tools: A semi-structured interview is conducted with thirteen auditors –six Big-4 and seven Non-Big 4 audit firms.
Findings: The findings show that the introduction of KAMs enhances the quality of audit in the form of better communication and transparency, especially, in big listed firms. It increases the managerial accountability which results in minimizing the agency cost of equity. However, the study also reveals that the auditors have the audacity to confess the pressures from clients and audit firms which lead to the hidden anomalies and EM practices that resulted in decreasing the audit quality, especially in non-Big 4 firms.
Contribution: The research shows that there is no uniformity in audit practice in UAE where own nationals (Emirates) enjoy more flexibility compare to foreigners. In addition, a difference exists in the audit practices of Big-4 and Non-Big 4 auditors. The non-existence of stringent audit regulatory body lead to effect the overall quality of the audit. The government should implement a uniform and robust audit regulatory body to ensure the audit quality.

Keywords: Audit Quality, Earnings Management, Key Audit Matters (KAMs), United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qualitative Research, Interviews, Agency Theory.

JEL Classification: M42, Z23, M41

Suggested Citation

Barghathi, Yasser and Mirani, Simran and Khan, Naimat Ullah, Audit quality and earnings management after communicating Key Audit Matters (KAMs) in the UAE – audacity and auditors’ perspectives (June 30, 2021). Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 20(2), pp. 173-198 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3948958

Yasser Barghathi (Contact Author)

Zayed University - College of Business ( email )

Zayed University
P.O. Box 144534
Dubai, Dubai
United Arab Emirates

Simran Mirani

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Naimat Ullah Khan

Cardiff School of Management, Cardiff Metropolitan University UK

Cardiff Metropolitan University, Llandaff Campus,
Cardiff, Wales CF5 2YB
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
299
Abstract Views
915
Rank
219,704
PlumX Metrics