A 'Good' Industrial Policy is Impossible: With an Application to AB5 and Contractors

40 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2021 Last revised: 10 Mar 2022

See all articles by Michael C. Munger

Michael C. Munger

Duke University - Department of Political Science; Duke University - Department of Economics; Institute for Corruption Studies

Date Written: October 26, 2021

Abstract

There are three categories of outcomes for industrial planning: the profit/market test, the political test, and expert-driven planning. An investigation of the history of the argument for industrial plans reveals that the chief obstacle is political failure, not market failure. For the sake of illustration, this paper argues that a "good" (ie, expert-driven top-down plan) is politically impossible, or at a minimum unsustainable, in a democracy. If (as many planner seem to believe) the politically-selected outcome is even worse than the market-selected outcome, the argument for industrial plans is called into question.

Keywords: industrial planning, market failure, public choice

Suggested Citation

Munger, Michael C., A 'Good' Industrial Policy is Impossible: With an Application to AB5 and Contractors (October 26, 2021). Law & Economics Center at George Mason University Scalia Law School Research Paper Series No. 22-007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3950782 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3950782

Michael C. Munger (Contact Author)

Duke University - Department of Political Science ( email )

140 Science Drive (Gross Hall), 2nd floor
Duke University Mailcode: 90204
Durham, NC 27708-0204
United States
919-660-4301 (Phone)
919-660-4330 (Fax)

Duke University - Department of Economics

213 Social Sciences Building
Box 90097
Durham, NC 27708-0204
United States

Institute for Corruption Studies

Stevenson Hall 425
Normal, IL 61790-4200
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
80
Abstract Views
362
rank
405,582
PlumX Metrics