Framing Tax Enforcement Against the Poor Through Catholic Social Teaching

11 Pages Posted: 2 Nov 2021 Last revised: 10 Dec 2021

Date Written: October 28, 2021

Abstract

What makes for just tax policy? Law and religion scholars have been paying greater attention to tax policy, with primary focus on questions of front-end tax system design. This focus has been understandable, as these questions of design appear to connect most readily to religious values about how burdens and resources should be distributed in a society, and what is the obligation of the citizen to comply with laws that direct a portion of his or her property to the government. Thus, evaluation of tax policy through a religious lens has most frequently focused on the important questions of what an appropriate rate of taxation should be; whether a tax system should be progressive; the nature of the moral obligation of citizens to comply with secular tax laws; and how religious framing of this obligation could potentially improve tax compliance.

This initial work is incomplete, however. In addition to applying a religious lens to the front-end design questions, law and religion scholars need to spend more time wrestling with the back-end administration and enforcement questions. Administration and enforcement of the tax laws can have considerable impact over whether a system of taxation is just – as the public is perhaps beginning to learn through the recent debate regarding increasing the IRS’s enforcement budget. Focusing value-based tax policy arguments primarily on the legislative component at the expense of the administrative can, even if successful, result in the Pyrrhic victory of legislative justice gains that are subsequently undermined by administrative failures.

In regards to the religious social teaching tradition with which I am most familiar, Catholic social teaching (CST), three pillars are relevant to how the IRS administers the tax system for the most economically vulnerable. The Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace’s Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, in arguing that “[p]ublic spending is directed to the common good when certain fundamental principles are observed,” describes “the payment of taxes as part of the duty of solidarity; a reasonable and fair application of taxes; precision and integrity in administering and distributing public resources.” Mentioned specifically in this statement are the principles of solidarity and the common good. In addition to these principles, “a reasonable and fair application of taxes,” combined with “precision and integrity in administering and distributing public resources” with a focus on the “common good,” should be read to involve two other pillars of Catholic social teaching: subsidiarity and the preferential option for the poor. Both of these principles would need to be advanced in any tax system that claims to be distributionally reasonable and precise in its administration. Although other principles of Catholic social teaching could likely be implicated to a lesser extent in tax enforcement, the starting point for a Catholic social teaching critique of tax enforcement should be these foundational principles: subsidiarity, solidarity, and the preferential option for the poor.

For those citizens whose value system is rooted in Catholic social teaching, they can look at the increasing growth of tax laws that provide benefits to the poor, and they can see their values reflected in their tax code. They will not, however, see their values similarly reflected in the enforcement of these laws. Because CST does not have a monopoly either among religious traditions or among secular value systems on emphasizing care for the poor, other citizens whose values prioritize the poor are likely to experience similar dissonance in comparing the tax laws to their administration.

The present moment offers an opportunity for these citizens to bring these values into the enforcement debate in order to remind the government that more enforcement resources, while necessary, are not sufficient unless they support enforcement values that match the underlying values of the laws themselves.

Keywords: tax, Catholic social teaching, earned income tax credit, solidarity, subsidiarity, preferential option for the poor, law and religion

Suggested Citation

Afield, Walter Edward, Framing Tax Enforcement Against the Poor Through Catholic Social Teaching (October 28, 2021). Canopy Forum, Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2021-20, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3954443

Walter Edward Afield (Contact Author)

Georgia State University College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
United States
404-413-9172 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.gsu.edu/profile/ted-afield/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
9
Abstract Views
72
PlumX Metrics