The Interplay between Information Acquisition and Information Integration: Evidence from EDGAR Search Volume around 10-K/10-Q Filing Dates

48 Pages Posted: 8 Nov 2021 Last revised: 19 Mar 2024

See all articles by Theodore E. Christensen

Theodore E. Christensen

University of Georgia - J.M. Tull School of Accounting; University of Georgia

Joshua G. Coyne

University of Central Arkansas

Kevin H. Kim

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)

Sangwan Kim

University of Massachusetts Boston

Date Written: March 15, 2024

Abstract

We investigate how investors integrate accounting information through their trading decisions. We first distinguish between information acquisition and information integration. Then, we explore two types of disclosure processing activities that constitute distinct aspects of information integration. The first, idiosyncratic interpretation, is when investors individually reach dissimilar conclusions based on common information. The second, consensus updating, is when investors jointly update their prior beliefs based on common information. Using EDGAR search volume of 10-K/10-Q reports around SEC filing dates as a proxy for information acquisition, we explore its interplay with these two aspects of information integration. Specifically, we find that, as information search increases, idiosyncratic interpretation increases, but consensus updating does not change. When we divide total search volume of 10-K/10-Q reports around SEC filing dates into search volume of newly filed reports and search volume of previously filed reports, we find that search volume of newly filed reports is associated with both increased idiosyncratic interpretation and consensus updating, whereas search volume of previously filed reports is associated with increased idiosyncratic interpretation and decreased consensus updating. We also find that the length of the report influences the association between information acquisition and information integration and that EDGAR search volume of sophisticated (retail) users appears to be more responsible for the consensus updating (idiosyncratic interpretation) effect. Taken together, our evidence suggests that information acquisition activities reveal useful insights about how investors integrate accounting information through their trading decisions.

Keywords: EDGAR search volume, Information acquisition, Information integration, Idiosyncratic interpretation, Consensus updating

JEL Classification: G14, M41

Suggested Citation

Christensen, Theodore E. and Coyne, Joshua G. and Kim, Kevin and Kim, Sangwan, The Interplay between Information Acquisition and Information Integration: Evidence from EDGAR Search Volume around 10-K/10-Q Filing Dates (March 15, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3957634 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3957634

Theodore E. Christensen

University of Georgia - J.M. Tull School of Accounting ( email )

Athens, GA 30602
United States

University of Georgia ( email )

Athens, GA
United States

Joshua G. Coyne (Contact Author)

University of Central Arkansas ( email )

201 Donaghey Ave.
Conway, AK 72035
United States

Kevin Kim

Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) ( email )

373-1 Kusong-dong
Yuson-gu
Taejon 305-701, 130-722
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Sangwan Kim

University of Massachusetts Boston ( email )

100 Morrissey Blvd.
Boston, MA 02125
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.umb.edu/faculty_staff/bio/sangwan_kim

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
234
Abstract Views
938
Rank
253,072
PlumX Metrics