Vaccine Hesitancy and Legal Ethics

31 Pages Posted: 28 Nov 2021 Last revised: 8 Apr 2022

See all articles by Noelle Wyman

Noelle Wyman

Yale University, Law School

Sam Heavenrich

Yale University, Law School

Date Written: 2022

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy remains an impediment to America’s successful emergence from the COVID-19 pandemic. This Article analyzes the role that legal ethics can play in countering hesitancy. Though the Rules of Professional Conduct do not obligate lawyers to be vaccinated, several prohibit lawyers from knowingly spreading disinformation about the importance, safety, and effectiveness of vaccines. As the recent fallout from the 2020 post-election litigation shows, however, professional discipline for spreading disinformation is possible but rare. Accordingly, we propose alternative avenues for aligning legal ethics with public health: requiring vaccine passports for court appearances, incorporating public health concerns into the Comments accompanying the Rules, and countering vaccine disinformation through continuing legal education.

Note:
Funding: None to declare.

Declaration of Interests: None to declare.

Suggested Citation

Wyman, Noelle and Heavenrich, Sam, Vaccine Hesitancy and Legal Ethics (2022). 35 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 1 (2022), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3958592 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3958592

Noelle Wyman (Contact Author)

Yale University, Law School ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States

Sam Heavenrich

Yale University, Law School ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
166
Abstract Views
689
Rank
275,520
PlumX Metrics