Imperfect Information and Party Responsiveness: Evidence from Extreme Weather Events and the Green Party in England

73 Pages Posted: 10 Nov 2021 Last revised: 3 Oct 2022

See all articles by António Valentim

António Valentim

Humboldt University of Berlin - Department of Social Sciences

Date Written: November 9, 2021

Abstract

Do parties respond to voters' preferences? Scholars of party politics often argue that parties respond to voters’ preferences to maximise their likelihood of being elected. I test this assumption by studying how changes in voters' preferences impact parties' strategies. Specifically, I study the effect of floods on the English Greens’ candidate allocation. I argue that floods provide an electoral opportunity for Green parties: they put the environment on the agenda and create an incentive for protest vote. Matching geospatial data with voting records, I use a difference-in-differences design to show that floods influence voters' preferences, but have no effect on the Greens' candidate allocation. Using surveys, campaign expenditure data and interviews, I find support for the idea that the party does not have the resources for or does not prioritise information on voters' preferences. These results are important to understand when elites respond to voters and react on the environment.

Keywords: Green Party, responsiveness, environment, difference-in-differences, England, voting behaviour, environmental politics, floods,extreme weather events.

Suggested Citation

Valentim, António, Imperfect Information and Party Responsiveness: Evidence from Extreme Weather Events and the Green Party in England (November 9, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3960045 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3960045

António Valentim (Contact Author)

Humboldt University of Berlin - Department of Social Sciences ( email )

Berlin
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
94
Abstract Views
526
rank
393,690
PlumX Metrics