Popular Constitutional Argument

78 Pages Posted: 24 Nov 2021

See all articles by Thomas Donnelly

Thomas Donnelly

Princeton University - Princeton University

Date Written: February 1, 2020

Abstract

Critics have long attacked popular constitutionalists for offering few clues for how their theory might work in practice—especially inside the courts. These critics are right. Popular constitutionalism—as a matter of both theory and practice—remains a work in progress. In this Article, I take up the challenge of developing an account of (what I call) popular constitutional argument. Briefly stated, popular constitutional argument is a form of argument that draws on the American people’s considered judgments as a source of constitutional authority—akin to traditional sources like text, history, structure, and doctrine. Turning to constitutional theory, I situate popular constitutional argument within contemporary debates over judicial restraint, living constitutionalism, popular sovereignty theory, and originalism. And turning to constitutional practice, I offer the interpreter a concrete framework for crafting popular constitutional arguments—cataloguing the various indicators of public opinion that have played a role in recent Supreme Court decisions. These indicators include measures associated with the President, Congress, state and local governments, the American people’s actions and traditions, and public opinion polls. Throughout, I use illustrative examples to show the various ways in which popular constitutional argument already operates at the Supreme Court—appealing to jurists from across the ideological spectrum. While this Article begins to explore how popular constitutionalism might operate inside the courts, much work remains.

Keywords: constitutional law, constitutional theory, judicial review, judicial supremacy, popular constitutionalism, popular sovereignty, Supreme Court, originalism, living constitutionalism

Suggested Citation

Donnelly, Thomas, Popular Constitutional Argument (February 1, 2020). Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 73, 2020, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3963508

Thomas Donnelly (Contact Author)

Princeton University - Princeton University ( email )

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
104
Abstract Views
220
rank
325,544
PlumX Metrics