Does the United States Need a More Targeted Industrial Policy for High Tech?

64 Pages Posted: 17 Nov 2021

See all articles by Adam D. Thierer

Adam D. Thierer

R Street Institute

Connor Haaland

Harvard University, Harvard Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: November 19, 2021

Abstract

Industrial policy is experiencing a major revival in the United States as policymakers and pundits of various ideological backgrounds propose ambitious new government schemes to boost innovation in a wide variety of sectors. Much of this advocacy focuses on creating detailed blueprints to encourage industrial development in various “strategic” high-tech sectors, such as semiconductors,
5G wireless networks, and artificial intelligence. Many of these planning proposals are framed as a response to Chinese and European industrial policy efforts.

The recent history of high-tech industrial policy efforts, however, is spotted with costly failures. In light of the difficulties inherent in more targeted industrial policy approaches, the United States should instead focus on the policy prerequisites that helped give rise to the computing and internet revolutions: a more generalized approach to economic development rooted in light-touch regulation and taxation of emerging technology.

Of course, industrial policy will always be with us to some extent, given the sheer size of government and the many existing programs already devoted to economic development or high-tech initiatives. Policymakers should therefore favor programs such as competitions, which minimize taxpayer risk and cost while also encouraging more innovative outcomes.

Keywords: industrial policy, research and development, R&D, innovation, technology, tech, planning, targeting, generality, government, regulation, competitiveness

JEL Classification: L52, L50, O25, O38, O2, O3, O33

Suggested Citation

Thierer, Adam D. and Haaland, Connor, Does the United States Need a More Targeted Industrial Policy for High Tech? (November 19, 2021). Mercatus Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3965696 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3965696

Adam D. Thierer (Contact Author)

R Street Institute ( email )

1050 17th Street Northwest
#1150
Washington, DC 20036
United States

Connor Haaland

Harvard University, Harvard Law School ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
102
Abstract Views
620
Rank
403,932
PlumX Metrics