The Principle and Politics of Liberty of Conscience

56 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2021 Last revised: 15 Feb 2022

Date Written: November 10, 2021

Abstract

Many on the left agree with conservatives that the current free exercise rule insufficiently protects religious minorities. The challenge is to articulate an approach that protects liberty of conscience without endangering the political equality that is essential for any democracy. This Comment argues for a conception that presumptively protects liberty of conscience while erecting democratic guardrails. This interpretation of free exercise is warranted and might even attract crosscutting support on the Roberts Court. Yet the Comment also offers reasons to be concerned that the approach could be deployed in the service of a problematic political program. Given that practical reality, lawyers and academics face a difficult choice among several strategies, all of which have serious drawbacks.

Keywords: free exercise, liberty of conscience, establishment clause, religious liberty, Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, coronavirus, COVID-19, Roberts Court

Suggested Citation

Tebbe, Nelson, The Principle and Politics of Liberty of Conscience (November 10, 2021). Harvard Law Review, Vol. 135, p. 267, 2021, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 21-42, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3969228

Nelson Tebbe (Contact Author)

Cornell Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
(607) 255-3506 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
262
Abstract Views
918
Rank
249,591
PlumX Metrics