Presidents in Deficit: Are There Historical Rewards to Deficits?

9 Pages Posted: 7 Dec 2021

See all articles by Vincent Geloso

Vincent Geloso

George Mason University - Department of Economics

Marcus Shera

Chapman University - Smith Institute for Political Economy and Philosophy; George Mason University, Department of Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Abstract

Buchanan and Wagner (1977) pointed to an asymmetry in the political rewards of deficits and surpluses with the former being preferable to the latter. We test this claim by relying on the historical reputation surveys of American presidents. Historical reputations have long been something presidents have cared for and they constitute a reliable way to assess whether their reputations suffer or gain from having run deficits. We find evidence that the size of deficits tends to be associated with greater presidential scores.

Keywords: Deficits, Public Choice, American Presidents

Suggested Citation

Geloso, Vincent and Shera, Marcus, Presidents in Deficit: Are There Historical Rewards to Deficits?. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3969628 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3969628

Vincent Geloso (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Department of Economics ( email )

4400 University Drive
Fairfax, VA 22030
United States

Marcus Shera

Chapman University - Smith Institute for Political Economy and Philosophy ( email )

One University Drive
Orange, CA 92866
United States

George Mason University, Department of Economics ( email )

4400 University Drive
Fairfax, VA 22030
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
229
PlumX Metrics