Damages for reputational harm: can privacy actions tread on defamation's turf?

Journal of Media Law, Volume 13, Issue 2, 2021, pp 186-210

27 Pages Posted: 7 Dec 2021 Last revised: 14 Sep 2023

See all articles by Jeevan Hariharan

Jeevan Hariharan

University of London - Queen Mary - Department of Law

Date Written: November 18, 2021

Abstract

In four recent cases, the High Court of England and Wales has had to consider whether damages for reputational harm can be recovered in a claim for misuse of private information ('MOPI'). This is an important issue which sharpens focus on the precise boundaries between privacy and defamation law. And yet it is a question on which the court is currently divided, with different judges coming to different conclusions on whether, and on what basis, reputational harm damages can be awarded in a privacy claim. This article argues that the key to resolving this issue is to better understand: (1) the precise interests protected by defamation and MOPI; and (2) how the interests protected by each tort are tied to the available heads of damage. Unpacking these points in turn, the article explains why damages for reputational harm should be restricted to defamation and be unavailable in a MOPI claim.

Suggested Citation

Hariharan, Jeevan, Damages for reputational harm: can privacy actions tread on defamation's turf? (November 18, 2021). Journal of Media Law, Volume 13, Issue 2, 2021, pp 186-210, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3971195

Jeevan Hariharan (Contact Author)

University of London - Queen Mary - Department of Law ( email )

Mile End Road
Mile End
London, E1 4NS
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
181
Abstract Views
633
Rank
332,092
PlumX Metrics