'An Outrage Upon Our Feelings': The Role of Local Governments in Resistance Movements

85 Pages Posted: 1 Dec 2021 Last revised: 12 May 2022

Date Written: November 27, 2021

Abstract

After the election of 2016, many who opposed President Trump and his policies argued that local governments and local power would be the best tools to resist those policies and strengthen democracy. Among the most prominent acts of local resistance in the last decade have been resolutions that declare a town or a city a “Sanctuary” and refuse to cooperate with federal authorities in the deportation of undocumented immigrants. This Article situates these resolutions in a long tradition of local opposition to state and federal laws that towns and cities deem unjust by examining local opposition to the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850. Drawing on original archival research, this Article exposes striking similarities between contemporary tactics of local resistance and the tactics of local governments in 1850–1851 that passed formal resolutions opposing the Fugitive Slave Law. This examination of how local governments responded to the Fugitive Slave Law poses two broad questions: what did local governments think they were doing when they passed these resolutions? And how much power did local governments really have to achieve those goals? The answers to these questions are complex and context specific. The local struggles that resulted in these resolutions were part of an ongoing political struggle against the seemingly intractable problem of slavery. The local resistance chronicled here is exceptional neither in its heroism nor its effectiveness. Rather it is striking in its familiar messiness and ambition. In some cases, towns seemed to have modest expressive goals that could be met by their resolutions. In other cases, the towns’ resolutions seem to suggest a much broader set of substantive goals that were beyond the power or capacity of the town to achieve. Examining these responses to the Fugitive Slave Law offers a new analytical perspective on local responses to the deportation crisis. Examining what local governments think they are doing when they pass sanctuary ordinances and comparing that with what they are empowered or willing to do helps us think more clearly about how and by what means local governments can resist national policies and engage in broad political struggles.

Keywords: Legal History, Local Government Law, Abolition, Social Movements, Fugitive Slave Law, Sanctuary Cities

Suggested Citation

Farbman, Daniel, 'An Outrage Upon Our Feelings': The Role of Local Governments in Resistance Movements (November 27, 2021). Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2021, Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 571, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3973229

Daniel Farbman (Contact Author)

Boston College - Law School ( email )

885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
97
Abstract Views
600
Rank
503,577
PlumX Metrics