EFFORTS TO SUE THE SEC OVER BROKER-INDUCEMENT REGULATION UNLIKELY TO SUCCEED

Ohio State Business Law Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 180–209 (2023)

George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 21-38

30 Pages Posted: 6 Dec 2021 Last revised: 25 Mar 2024

See all articles by J. W. Verret

J. W. Verret

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School

Date Written: November 30, 2021

Abstract

This article considers a rulemaking effort underway at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to regulate the conflicts of interest that result when brokers send client orders to venues that pay the broker a fee in exchange for routing to them. These payments for order flow or rebates present a distortive conflict to a broker's duty of best execution that has troubled the SEC for over 40 years and which the SEC has tried to regulate through multiple reforms. The SEC's new Chairman has indicated he will more forcefully address broker conflicts. A number of regulated entities have threatened to challenge the rule in court.

Keywords: SEC, Robinhood, trading app, order flow, PFOF, rulemaking

JEL Classification: K2, K20, K22

Suggested Citation

Verret, J. W., EFFORTS TO SUE THE SEC OVER BROKER-INDUCEMENT REGULATION UNLIKELY TO SUCCEED (November 30, 2021). Ohio State Business Law Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 180–209 (2023), George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 21-38, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3974960 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3974960

J. W. Verret (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
344
Abstract Views
1,267
Rank
170,344
PlumX Metrics