Reputation Shocks and Strategic Political Responses

41 Pages Posted: 2 Dec 2021

See all articles by Rubén Poblete-Cazenave

Rubén Poblete-Cazenave

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Economics (ESE); Tinbergen Institute


Information affecting a candidate’s reputation might have significant consequences for elections and policy making. How does this information affect candidates’ behavior? Using Brazilian elections and audits as an exogenous source of information, I show that politicians respond to information by adapting political campaigns and public policy. Both incumbent and challenger increase their campaign spending when detrimental information affects the incumbent’s reputation. Conversely, beneficial information decreases candidates’ spending. As information affects the expected competitiveness of elections, candidates adapt their spending accordingly. Yet, only information disclosed before electoral campaigns impacts spending. Furthermore, incumbents also adapt a conditional cash transfers program by increasing (decreasing) the beneficiaries when detrimental (beneficial) reputation shocks occur. The results shed light on how and when politicians react to information and uncover a negative side of campaign spending, that can be used to counterbalance information about corruption.

Keywords: Information, Politicians, Electoral campaigns, Corruption, Patronage

Suggested Citation

Poblete-Cazenave, Rubén, Reputation Shocks and Strategic Political Responses. Available at SSRN: or

Rubén Poblete-Cazenave (Contact Author)

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) ( email )

P.O. Box 1738
3000 DR Rotterdam, NL 3062 PA

Tinbergen Institute ( email )

Burg. Oudlaan 50
Rotterdam, 3062 PA

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics