The Founder Premium Revisited

52 Pages Posted: 6 Dec 2021

See all articles by Bradley E. Hendricks

Bradley E. Hendricks

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School

Travis Howell

University of California, Irvine

Date Written: August 1, 2021

Abstract

Much research finds evidence of a “founder premium” – i.e., that founder leadership is positively associated with both the valuations and stock performance of public firms. However, this empirical finding is puzzling as it appears mismatched with management theory suggesting that leadership styles and capabilities must change as a firm evolves and becomes more complex. Motivated by this disconnect, we re-examine the founder premium in public firms. We find that a valuation premium is associated with founder leadership at IPO, but that it quickly disappears as these firms underperform on the secondary market. Our findings also indicate that the premium associated with having a founder-CEO declines more rapidly relative to the premium associated with having a founder in a non-CEO position. Together, our results provide needed boundary conditions for the founder premium and offer a stronger theory/data fit by underscoring how managerial capabilities must be updated as firms grow and develop.

JEL Classification: Founders, Firm performance, Initial public offerings, CEO turnover, Endogeneity

Suggested Citation

Hendricks, Bradley E. and Howell, Travis, The Founder Premium Revisited (August 1, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3977112 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3977112

Bradley E. Hendricks (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School ( email )

McColl Building
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3490
United States
(919) 962-3619 (Phone)

Travis Howell

University of California, Irvine ( email )

4293 Pereira Dr
Irvine, CA 92697
United States
8016613377 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
439
Abstract Views
2,997
Rank
175,991
PlumX Metrics