'In the Public Interest' - University Technology Transfer and the Nine Points Document – An Empirical Assessment

University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 476

12(2) U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 435 (2023)

79 Pages Posted: 27 Dec 2021 Last revised: 17 Apr 2023

See all articles by Jorge L. Contreras

Jorge L. Contreras

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Date Written: December 21, 2021

Abstract

In 2007, eleven major U.S. research universities and the Association of American Medical Colleges signed an accord titled “In the Public Interest: Nine Points to Consider in Licensing University Technology.” It outlined a range of issues that universities should consider when licensing their technology to the private sector - from reservations of rights and limitations on exclusivity to limiting dealings with patent assertion entities to making medical technologies accessible at affordable prices. More than talking points, the document proposed specific contractual clauses intended to promote the educational and public welfare missions of universities. Today, more than a hundred academic institutions and associations around the world have signed the Nine Points document. Yet in the fifteen years since the document was created, there has been no systematic, empirical assessment of its effect on university licensing practices. This article fills that gap with the first empirical study of the impact of the Nine Points document on university licensing practices. Through a review of 220 publicly available university technology licenses signed both before and after the adoption of the Nine Points document, this article finds that while the document prompted the expansion of educational and non-profit research using patented university technology, it resulted in few changes relating to the promotion of public health or access to medical technologies. This mixed adoption of the recommendations made by the Nine Points document suggests that there is little consensus regarding the nature of the ‘public interest’ that the Nine Points document sought to promote. This article recommends that a reorientation of university technology transfer policy may be in order – one that could be facilitated through greater engagement of academic faculty, senior administrators, students, alumni and other institutional stakeholders in setting policy for university technology transfer.

Keywords: Nine Points, university, patent, Bayh-Dole, licensing, public health, pharmaceuticals

Suggested Citation

Contreras, Jorge L., 'In the Public Interest' - University Technology Transfer and the Nine Points Document – An Empirical Assessment (December 21, 2021). University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 476, 12(2) U.C. Irvine L. Rev. 435 (2023), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3990450 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3990450

Jorge L. Contreras (Contact Author)

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )

383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
392
Abstract Views
2,013
Rank
142,887
PlumX Metrics