Legal Realism and Australian Constitutional Law

20 Pages Posted: 17 Mar 2022

See all articles by Jeremy Patrick

Jeremy Patrick

University of Southern Queensland School of Law

Date Written: January 26, 2022

Abstract

Our traditional understanding of judicial decision-making is that judges apply the law to a set of facts and reach a result. This is known as legal formalism. But what if this is backwards? What if the process of judicial reasoning is to decide on the result, and then rhetorically justify it with particular interpretations of legal rules and facts? This paper applies the descriptive theory of legal realism in a particular context (Australian constitutional law) alongside a qualitative empirical study to help decide whether legal formalism or legal realism best explains High Court decision-making.

Keywords: Australian Constitution, Legal Realism, Jurisprudence, High Court

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Patrick, Jeremy J., Legal Realism and Australian Constitutional Law (January 26, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4018056 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4018056

Jeremy J. Patrick (Contact Author)

University of Southern Queensland School of Law ( email )

Room Q-416
USQ
Toowoomba, QLD 4350
Australia
+61 7 4631 5374 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://legalheresy.blogspot.com

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
53
Abstract Views
133
rank
506,108
PlumX Metrics