Political Stigmatization and Preference Falsification: Theory and Observational Evidence

69 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2022 Last revised: 28 Mar 2023

See all articles by Vicente Valentim

Vicente Valentim

University of Oxford - Nuffield College

Date Written: February 1, 2022


Do political preferences translate into behavior? I argue that when individuals support a stigmatized party, they have an incentive to hide that support. I start with providing a social-norms based definition of political stigmatization. Then, I show observational evidence of stigmatization leading to the falsification of political preferences. I study a Spanish region where voting was public in one election. Qualitative evidence shows that, as a consequence, voters felt that their vote could be observed. Triple differences models show that this observability decreased voting for PP, a stigmatized party in the country. Effect heterogeneity is in line with the preference falsification argument. At the individual level, supporters of PP make more efforts to keep their vote choice secret. Those who make such efforts also show more discomfort answering political surveys. The results highlight social norms as predictors of political behavior and underline the electoral consequences of changing voting procedures.

Keywords: Social norms, preference falsification, mainstream parties, stigmatization, democratic norms, Spain

Suggested Citation

Valentim, Vicente, Political Stigmatization and Preference Falsification: Theory and Observational Evidence (February 1, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4023263 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4023263

Vicente Valentim (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Nuffield College ( email )

United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics