Comment on 2021 DOJ-USPTO-NIST Draft Policy Statement

5 Pages Posted: 10 Feb 2022

See all articles by Bowman Heiden

Bowman Heiden

University of California, Berkeley - Haas School of Business; Center for Intellectual Property, University of Gothenburg

Date Written: February 6, 2022

Abstract

This paper is a succinct response to the request for comments regarding the 2021 draft SEP policy statement by DOJ, USPTO, and NIST. I have tried to summarize several key insights from my previous research and policy experience that form the foundation for understanding SEP-enabled standards and SEP policymaking, including:

1. SEP-enabled standards have produced market successes, not market failures
2. Why injunctions do not create patent holdup in the SEP licensing context
3. Without injunctions, SEP licensors are in the weaker bargaining position
4. Is there a need for a DOJ-USPTO-NIST SEP policy statement?

Keywords: Standards, patents, injunction, patent holdup, paten holdout, SEP

JEL Classification: L15, L24, K21, O31, O34

Suggested Citation

Heiden, Bowman, Comment on 2021 DOJ-USPTO-NIST Draft Policy Statement (February 6, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4027975 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4027975

Bowman Heiden (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley - Haas School of Business

Institute for Business Innovation
2220 Piedmont Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

Center for Intellectual Property, University of Gothenburg ( email )

Vasagatan 1
Gothenburg, 40530
Sweden

HOME PAGE: http://www.cip-net.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
101
Abstract Views
397
Rank
479,686
PlumX Metrics