Impact of Capital Market Events on Market Efficiency

40 Pages Posted: 23 Feb 2022 Last revised: 27 Apr 2022

Date Written: April 26, 2022

Abstract

I use eight objective and systematic measures of the efficiency of the market for a stock. Based on the market microstructure models of Kyle and Obizhaeva (2016) and Bhattacharya (2019), I develop a six-equation (five- for non-Nasdaq stocks) structural model with market efficiency as a function of exogenous factors (transaction costs & constraints, short sales costs & constraints, and dispersion in investor valuations) and endogenous market activities (Kyle-Obizhaeva liquidity measure, short interest, number of analysts, institutional holdings, and number of market makers (for Nasdaq stocks)), and each endogenous market activity as a function of the exogenous factors and all other endogenous market activities. I apply Three Stage Least Squares and Errors in Variables to estimate the structural system, using panel-based instrumentation strategies for endogenous and inaccurately measured variables. Analyzing Nasdaq and non-Nasdaq stocks separately, I find that market efficiency improved significantly a) following Dot-Com Bubble, Reg FD, SOx, and Global Analyst Research Settlements, and then, b) after the GFC and Dodd-Frank.

Keywords: Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Earnings Announcements; Key Developments; Arbitrage Risk; Idiosyncratic Risk; Kyle-Obizhaeva Liquidity; Events; Structural System; Endogeneity; Simultaneity; Missing/Unavailable Data; Proxy Variables; Instrumental Variables

JEL Classification: G14; G12; C58; C33; C36

Suggested Citation

Bhattacharya, Rajeev, Impact of Capital Market Events on Market Efficiency (April 26, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4030185 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4030185

Rajeev Bhattacharya (Contact Author)

Washington Finance and Economics ( email )

United States

HOME PAGE: http://washington-finance.com

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
87
Abstract Views
324
rank
386,641
PlumX Metrics