The Effect of Management Incentives and Audit Committee Quality on Internal Auditors' Planning Assessments and Decisions

33 Pages Posted: 30 May 2003

See all articles by Stephen Kwaku Asare

Stephen Kwaku Asare

University of Florida - Fisher School of Accounting

Ronald A. Davidson

Arizona State University West

Audrey A. Gramling

Oklahoma State University - Stillwater - School of Accounting

Date Written: April 2003

Abstract

We examine the sensitivity of internal auditors' fraud risk assessments and audit effort decisions (i.e., budgeted hours) to variations in management's incentives to intentionally misstate their financial position, and in the quality of a firm's audit committee. Internal auditors are an integral part of an organization's monitoring scheme and it is important to understand how, and how well, their judgments are influenced by factors known to be associated with fraudulent financial reporting.

We hypothesize that internal auditors' fraud risk judgments and audit effort decisions will vary with management incentives and quality of audit committee, consistent with documented archival evidence and professional prescriptions. The experimental results, based on responses from 60 internal auditors completing a hypothetical case regarding a potential acquisition target, indicate that internal auditors' fraud risk assessments are responsive to management incentives and variations in the quality of the audit committee. Our results also indicate that internal auditors' budgeted audit hours are sensitive to variations in management incentives to misreport financial information, but are not sensitive to variations in audit committee quality. This latter result implies that internal auditors are aware that stronger audit committees decrease the risk of fraudulent financial reporting, but do not use that knowledge to reduce fraud related work. These results generally hold for a second experiment in which another group of internal auditors was asked to complete the same hypothetical case, but rather than evaluating an acquisition target, they made planning judgments for an audit area of the company in which they were employed. Thus, the results generally hold whether the internal auditors are performing due diligence for a possible acquisition or are auditing their own organization where they may have incentives congruent with organization management, and may have familiarity with the audit committee.

Keywords: audit committees, audit planning, fraud risk, internal auditors, management incentives

JEL Classification: M41, M49, M43

Suggested Citation

Asare, Stephen Kwaku and Davidson, Ronald A. and Gramling, Audrey A., The Effect of Management Incentives and Audit Committee Quality on Internal Auditors' Planning Assessments and Decisions (April 2003). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=403240 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.403240

Stephen Kwaku Asare

University of Florida - Fisher School of Accounting ( email )

Warrington College of Business
PO Box 117166
Gainesville, FL 32611-7166
United States
352-392-5860 (Phone)

Ronald A. Davidson

Arizona State University West ( email )

School of Management 4701 West Thunderbird Road
Phoenix, AZ 85069
United States
602-543-6127 (Phone)
602-543-6303 (Fax)

Audrey A. Gramling (Contact Author)

Oklahoma State University - Stillwater - School of Accounting ( email )

College of Business Administration
345 Business Building
Stillwater, OK 74078
United States