Cross-Border Environmental Regulation and Firm Labor Demand

Abstract

In 1994, due to environmental concerns, Germany banned a chemical called ‘Azodyes’, a primary input for the leather and textiles firms in India (a key exporter). Exploiting this as a quasi-natural experiment, we examine the effects of this crossborder regulatory change on labor compensation, particularly managerial, for both Indian upstream (dye-producing) and downstream (leather and textile) firms. We find that the regulation increased compensation of managers by 3–18% in dye-producing firms compared to other chemical firms. This is due to the combination of changes such as investing in R&D and product churning, due to the ban, which led to this change in within firm labor composition. This increase in overall compensation is driven only by fixed component (wages), consistent with the effects of a long-run shock. We find no such effects for downstream firms. We believe, our study is one of the first to show that just like tariff, non-tariff barriers (NTBs) through environmental regulation can also significantly affect within firm labor composition.

Keywords: 'Azo-dyes', Non-tariff barriers, Cross-border environmental regulation, Managerial Compensation, Dye-producing Firms, Upstream and Downstream Sectors