Anoxic/Oxic Treatment Without Biomass Recycle

26 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2022

See all articles by Qingyuan Lu

Qingyuan Lu

Shanghai Normal University

Junqing Zhou

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Ge Zhu

Shanghai Normal University

Chong Tan

Shanghai Normal University

Songyun Chen

Shanghai Normal University

Xiaohui Zhu

Shanghai Normal University

Ning Yan

Shanghai Normal University

Yongming Zhang

Shanghai Normal University

Qiuen Xu

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Bifeng Pan

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Bruce E. Rittmann

Arizona State University (ASU) - Biodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology

Abstract

The Anoxic/Oxic (A/O) process involves recirculating mixed liquor between its A and O tanks so that nitrate produced in the O tank can be used to for denitrification with influent COD in the A tank.  Because biomass is recirculated along with nitrate, A/O operation leads to similar microbial communities in the A and O tanks, which may decrease the rates of denitrification and nitrification in each tank.  Here, bench-scale experiments simulated this aspect of the A/O process by exchanging biomass between an anoxic flask and an oxic cylinder at exchange ratios of 0%, 20%, 30%, and 50%.  Nitrification and dentrification rates and the proportion of Live bacteria declined with more biomass exchange:  up to 30% and 50% rate declines, respectively, with 50% biomass exchange.  Phylogenetic analysis documented that the microbial communities became much more similar with biomass exchange, a finding consistent with community composition with a full-scale A/O process in a municipal wastewater treatment plants.  A two-stage vertical baffled bioreactor (VBBR) realized efficient total-nitrogen removal in recirculation without biomass exchange.  Removals of COD and TN were slightly better for the two-stage VBBR than the conventional A/O process, but its hydraulic retention time (HRT) was 55% to 70% of the volume of a conventional A/O process treating the same influent wastewater.  The VBBR was more efficient because its anoxic biofilm was enriched in denitrifying bacteria, while its oxic biofilm was enriched in nitrifying bacteria.

Keywords: Nitrification, Denitrification, biomass cycle, vertical baffled bioreactor, contribution of microbiological community

Suggested Citation

Lu, Qingyuan and Zhou, Junqing and Zhu, Ge and Tan, Chong and Chen, Songyun and Zhu, Xiaohui and Yan, Ning and Zhang, Yongming and Xu, Qiuen and Pan, Bifeng and Rittmann, Bruce E., Anoxic/Oxic Treatment Without Biomass Recycle. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4037852 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4037852

Qingyuan Lu

Shanghai Normal University ( email )

Junqing Zhou

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Ge Zhu

Shanghai Normal University ( email )

Chong Tan

Shanghai Normal University ( email )

Songyun Chen

Shanghai Normal University ( email )

Xiaohui Zhu

Shanghai Normal University ( email )

Ning Yan

Shanghai Normal University ( email )

Yongming Zhang (Contact Author)

Shanghai Normal University ( email )

Qiuen Xu

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Bifeng Pan

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Bruce E. Rittmann

Arizona State University (ASU) - Biodesign Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology ( email )

Tempe, AZ
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
327
PlumX Metrics