Prescribing Exploitation

59 Pages Posted: 4 May 2022

See all articles by Charlotte Tschider

Charlotte Tschider

Loyola University Chicago School of Law

Date Written: February 18, 2022

Abstract

Patients are increasingly reliant temporarily, if not indefinitely, on connected medical devices and wearables, many of which use artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructures and physical housing that directly interacts with the human body. The automated systems that drive the infrastructures of medical devices and wearables, especially those using complex AI, often use dynamically inscrutable algorithms that may render discriminatory effects that alter paths of treatment and other aspects of patient welfare.

Previous contributions to the literature, however, have not explored how AI technologies animate exploitation of medical technology users. Although all commercial relationships may exploit users to some degree, some forms of health data exploitation exceed the bounds of normative acceptability. The factors that illustrate excessive exploitation that should require some legal intervention include: 1) existence of a fiduciary relationship or approximation of such a relationship, 2) a technology-user relationship that does not involve the expertise of the fiduciary, 3) existence of a critical health event or health status requiring use of a medical device, 4) ubiquitous sensitive data collection essential to AI functionality, 5) lack of reasonably similar analog technology alternatives, and 6) compulsory reliance on a medical device.

This paper makes three key contributions to existing literature. First, this paper establishes the existence of a type of exploitation that is not only exacerbated by technology but creates additional risk by its use. Second, this paper illustrates the need for cross-disciplinary engagement across privacy scholarship and AI ethical goals that typically involve representative data collection for fairness and safety. This paper then illustrates how a modern information fiduciary model can neutralize patient exploitation risk when exploitation exceeds normative bounds of community acceptability.

Note:
Funding Information: None to declare.

Declaration of Interests: None to declare.

Keywords: Big data, artificial intelligence, health law, privacy law, data protection, exploitation, law and philosophy

Suggested Citation

Tschider, Charlotte, Prescribing Exploitation (February 18, 2022). Maryland Law Review, Forthcoming 2023, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4038470 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4038470

Charlotte Tschider (Contact Author)

Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )

25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
504
rank
487,146
PlumX Metrics