The Dialogical Roots of Deduction: Historical, Cognitive, and Philosophical Perspectives on Reasoning, Catarina Dutilh Novaes (Cambridge University Press 2021), 271 pages (Book Review)

Legal Writing: Journal of the Legal Writing Institute, Vol. 26, pp. 227-39, 2022

Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 22-28

14 Pages Posted: 4 Mar 2022 Last revised: 27 Sep 2022

See all articles by Brian Larson

Brian Larson

Texas A&M University School of Law

Date Written: February 28, 2022

Abstract

Many legal scholars argue that deduction is at the center of legal reasoning. It also holds pride of place in legal-writing and legal-theory texts. Some, on the other hand, have argued that deduction is not central—or at least not necessary—to the process of legal reasoning. Others have gone further, arguing that deduction and the IRAC or CREAC organizational paradigm are hallmarks of an oppressively racist and misogynistic legal system. This review is no place to rehearse or extend those arguments, but Catarina Dutilh Novaes’ book The Dialogical Roots of Deduction: Historical, Cognitive, and Philosophical Perspectives on Reasoning is essential for understanding them, for understanding what deduction is, has been, and perhaps should be. Of course, as Dutilh Novaes says, “it is not surprising that philosophers, mathematicians, and scientists would be impressed by the deductive method, with its allure of certainty and its promise of unshakable foundations.” This review does not take special pains to evaluate Dutilh Novaes’ principal claims. Instead, my evaluation is that this book succeeds broadly in achieving her hopes that the reader leaves “with a richer, more nuanced conception of deduction,” including “obtain[ing] a better appreciation of how much of a cognitive oddity deduction really is.” So if you talk about what lawyers, judges, and your students do as “deduction,” “deductive,” “syllogisms”’ or “syllogistic,” you should read this book just to be sure you know what you’re talking about.

Keywords: deduction, syllogism, legal reasoning, dialogical argument

Suggested Citation

Larson, Brian, The Dialogical Roots of Deduction: Historical, Cognitive, and Philosophical Perspectives on Reasoning, Catarina Dutilh Novaes (Cambridge University Press 2021), 271 pages (Book Review) (February 28, 2022). Legal Writing: Journal of the Legal Writing Institute, Vol. 26, pp. 227-39, 2022, Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 22-28, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4045629 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4045629

Brian Larson (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX Tarrant County 76102
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
165
Abstract Views
1,310
Rank
383,512
PlumX Metrics